Implikasi Debt Trap Diplomacy dalam Proyek Belt and Road Initiative di Sri Lanka: Analisis Perspektif Keamanan Tradisional

Author


Feodor Farrel Sulistyo(1Mail),
(1) Universitas Hasanuddin,

Mail Corresponding Author
Article Analytic
  [File Size: 349KB]  Language: en
Available online: 2026-06-20  |  Published : 2026-06-20
Copyright (c) 2026 Feodor Farrel Sulistyo
Article can trace at:

Article Metrics

Abstract Views: 39 times PDF Downloaded: 11 times

Abstract


This study examines the phenomenon of Debt Trap Diplomacy in Sri Lanka as a manifestation of economic statecraft within the framework of the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI), as well as its implications for the country's sovereignty and traditional security. The research employs a qualitative descriptive-analytical approach through a case study of the acquisition of Hambantota Port, drawing upon Kenneth Waltz's neorealist theory as the primary analytical framework, supplemented by the concepts of geoeconomics and traditional security.The findings indicate that China's involvement in Sri Lanka through BRI infrastructure financing mechanisms gradually created a structure of economic dependency, culminating in the transfer of control over Hambantota Port through a 99-year lease agreement to the Chinese state-owned enterprise China Merchants Port Holdings in 2017. Although empirical evidence suggests that Sri Lanka's debt crisis was also driven by domestic governance failures and fiscal mismanagement, the transfer of control over this strategic maritime infrastructure has generated significant security implications, both for Sri Lanka and for the broader stability of the Indian Ocean region. From a neorealist perspective, this phenomenon reflects China's systematic efforts to address its strategic vulnerabilities through the projection of non-military power, while also demonstrating that, in the modern era, the erosion of territorial sovereignty can occur through economic instruments without the need for armed confrontation.

Keywords


Debt Trap Diplomacy, Belt and Road Initiative (BRI), Hambantota Port, Neorealism, Traditional Security, Economic Statecraft, National Sovereignty.

References


(n.d.). Hubungan Bilateral China dan Sri Lanka, 9.

Ajnoti, R. (2022). The Complete Story of Debt-Trap Diplomacy. Retrieved from https://thegeopolitics.com/the-complete-story-of-debt-trap-diplomacy/

Akbar, I. (2024). KONFLIK INDIA-PAKISTAN IMPLIKASINYA TERHADAP KEAMANAN DI WILAYAH KASHMIR MELALUI PERSPEKTIF NEOREALISME, 74.

Ananda, R. (2023). Pengaruh Kerja Sama Tiongkok dan Sri Lanka dalam Pembangunan Hambantota terhadap Perekonomian Sri Lanka 2014-2017, 3.

Ariyawardana, S. N. (2022). The Implications of China's Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) On Sri Lanka In The Future, 16.

Baldwin, D. (2020). Retrieved from Economic Statecraft: https://www.britannica.com/topic/economic-statecraft.

Elvira Nuraini, E. C. (2025). MANIFESTASI ECONOMIC STATECRAFT CHINA DALAM PROYEK, 66-67.

FRATIWI, V. (2025). KEBIJAKAN PERDAGANGAN TIONGKOK DALAM MENGURANGI KETERGANTUNGAN DOLAR AS PADA PERANG DAGANG, 92.

Ghiretti, F. (2025). The Return of Economic Statecraft. Retrieved from https://www.rand.org/pubs/commentary/2025/10/the-return-of-economic-statecraft.html

Gopaldas, R. (2018, February). Lessons from Sri Lanka on China's 'debt-trap diplomacy. Retrieved from https://issafrica.org/iss-today/lessons-from-sri-lanka-on-chinas-debt-trap-diplomacy#:~:text=It%20is%20important%20to%20recap,a%20straightjacket%20of%20debt%20servitude.

Hasanah, & dkk. (2022). Krisis Utang Sri Lanka dalam Kerja Sama Pembangunan, 5.

Imawan, I. I., & dkk. (2025). Krisis Utang Global di Tengah Ketegangan Geopolitik: Memetakan Ketimpangan Ekonomi Negara Berkembang dengan Clustering Machine Learning, 198.

IMF. (2025). Sri Lankas Sovereign Debt Restructuring: Lessons from Complex Processes. International Monetary Fund.

Institute, P. S. (2024). Traditional National Security: Protecting Territorial Integrity PolSci Institute. Retrieved from https://polsci.institute/global-politics/traditional-national-security-territorial-integrity/

Justice, C. f. (2024). The Silk Road's Burden: Sri Lanka's Journey through Chinese Debt, 3. Retrieved May Friday, 2026, from https://www.urgewald.org/sites/default/files/media-files/Sri_Lanka_Chinese_Debt.pdf

KALLIO, J. (2022). CHINAS BELT AND ROAD INITIATIVE SUCCESSFUL ECONOMIC STRATEGY OR FAILED SOFT-POWER TOOL?

Lakshmi, A. (2021). Chinese Debt Trap Diplomacy in Hambantota: Implications. Retrieved from CLAWS: https://claws.co.in/chinese-debt-trap-diplomacy-in-hambantota-implications/

MIAP. (2026). Hambantota Port Rises as Strategic Hub amid Gulf Conflict - LNW Lanka News Web. Retrieved from https://lankanewsweb.net/archives/188591/hambantota-port-rises-as-strategic-hub-amid-gulf-conflict/

Ryo Sahashi, Y. M. (2024). Asia Rising. Tokyo.

Saraswati, N. M. (2019). Menilik Perjanjian Indonesia-Cina dalam Kerangka Belt, 56.

Sulistiyawan, E., & dkk. (2024). PENGARUH PASAR CINA TERHADAP EKONOMI GLOBAL, 2.

Waltz, K. (1979). Theories of International Politics.

WANG. (2021). Retrieved from About the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI): https://greenfdc.org/belt-and-road-initiative-about/.

Amaritasari, I. (2015). Keamanan Nasional dalam Konsep dan Standar Internasional. Jurnal Keamanan Nasional, 1(2), 153174. https://doi.org/10.31599/jkn.v1i2.21

Rifka Alkhilyatul Marifat, I Made Suraharta, I. I. J. (2024). No Title ??No Title No Title No Title. 2, 306312.

Amineh, M. P., & Li, S. (2025). The structural challenges of transnationalizing the China-led BRI: The case of Pakistan. Journal of Developing Societies. https://doi.org/10.1177/0169796X251369694

Anam, S., & Ristiyani, R. (2021). Kebijakan Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) Tiongkok pada masa pemerintahan Xi Jinping. Jurnal Ilmiah Hubungan Internasional, 17(1). https://doi.org/10.26593/jihi.v14i2.2842

Hameiri, S., & Jones, L. (2024). China, international competition and the stalemate in sovereign debt restructuring: Beyond geopolitics. International Affairs, 100(2), 691710. https://doi.org/10.1093/ia/iiae017

Himmer, M., et al. (2023). Chinese debt trap diplomacy: Reality or myth? East Asia: An International Quarterly, 40, 250272. https://doi.org/10.1080/19480881.2023.2195280

Kandaudahewa, H. (2023). Sri Lanka's strategic dilemma. Journal of Indo-Pacific Affairs. https://media.defense.gov/2023/Sep/21/2003305661/-1/-1/1/JIPA%20-%20KANDAUDAHEWA.PDF

Kostecka-Tomaszewska, L., & Krukowska, M. (2021). China's economic statecraft: The role of the Belt and Road Initiative. European Research Studies Journal, 24(2). https://ersj.eu/journal/2170

Mahendra, Y. I., Ramadhoan, R. I., & Suhermanto, D. F. (2023). Pengaruh kebijakan Belt and Road Initiative Tiongkok terhadap stabilitas sub-kompleks keamanan Asia Tenggara. Jurnal Ilmiah Hubungan Internasional, 19(2). https://doi.org/10.26593/jihi.v19i2.5788

Mallick, S. (2024). China's Belt and Road Initiative: Impact on South Asia's geopolitical landscape and regional dynamics. South Asian Survey. https://doi.org/10.1177/09735984251327850

Moramudali, U., & Panduwawala, T. (2024). The political economy of Hambantota Port: Unveiling the realities of debt trap diplomacy and BRI vision. Asian Journal of Political Science, 32(3), 380399. https://doi.org/10.1080/02185377.2024.2424758

SAIS Review of International Affairs. (2025). How sovereign debt crises are becoming geopolitical: Lessons from Sri Lanka. Johns Hopkins University. https://saisreview.sais.jhu.edu/how-sovereign-debt-crises-are-becoming-geopolitical-lessons-from-sri-lanka/

United States Institute of Peace (USIP). (2023). Does China's coercive economic statecraft actually work? https://www.usip.org/publications/2023/03/does-chinas-coercive-economic-statecraft-actually-work

Vivekananda International Foundation. (2022). China's debt trap diplomacy in Sri Lanka. https://www.vifindia.org/article/2022/july/30/china-s-debt-trap-diplomacy-in-sri-Lanka


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.