Etika Beragama, Berpaham, dan Bermazhab dalam Perspektif Islam

Author


Anggi Anggraini(1Mail), Hamzah Harun(2), Indo Santalia(3),
(1) UIN Alauddin Makassar,
(2) UIN Alauddin Makassar,
(3) UIN Alauddin Makassar,

Mail Corresponding Author
Article Analytic
  [File Size: 313KB]  Language: en
Available online: 2025-11-25  |  Published : 2025-11-25
Copyright (c) 2026 Anggi Anggraini, Hamzah Harun, Indo Santalia
Article can trace at:

Article Metrics

Abstract Views: 13 times PDF Downloaded: 10 times

Abstract


Differences in religion, schools of thought, and legal schools (madhhab) are historicaltheological realities inherent in the Islamic tradition. However, in contemporary socio-religious practice, these differences often undergo ethical distortions that lead to exclusivism, the delegitimization of other groups, and symbolic conflicts in the name of religious truth. This article aims to analyze the concept of ethics in religion, thought, and madhhab from an Islamic perspective using a normativephilosophical approach, and to affirm its relevance within plural Muslim societies, particularly in Indonesia. This study employs a qualitative method based on library research by analyzing primary sources (the Quran and Hadith) and secondary sources in the form of works by classical scholars and contemporary Islamic thinkers. The findings indicate that Islam normatively positions ethics as a fundamental foundation in responding to differences, as reflected in the principles of adab al-ikhtil?f (ethics of disagreement), tas?muh (tolerance), taw?zun (balance), ad?lah (justice), and wasathiyyah (moderation). The novelty of this article lies in its normativephilosophical synthesis between classical Islamic ethical concepts and contemporary discourse on religious moderation, thereby framing adherence to a madhhab not merely as juridical loyalty, but as a moralintellectual awareness aimed at preserving the common good (ma?la?ah) and social harmony.

Keywords


Islamic Ethics, Ikhtilaf, Madhhab, Religious Moderation, Islamic Thought

References


Abou El Fadl, Khaled. The Great Theft: Wrestling Islam from the Extremists. New York: HarperOne, 2005.

Al-Ghazali. Ihya Ulum al-Din. Jil. 1. Beirut: Dar al-Fikr, t.t.

Al-Shatibi. Al-Muwafaqat fi Usul al-Shariah. Vol. 2. Cairo: Dar Ibn Affan, 1997.

Al-Syafii, Muhammad ibn Idris. Al-Risalah. Beirut: Dar al-Kutub al-Ilmiyyah, t.t.

Azra, Azyumardi. Islam in the Indonesian World: An Account of Institutional Formation. Bandung: Mizan, 2006.

Azra, Azyumardi. Jaringan Ulama Timur Tengah dan Kepulauan Nusantara Abad XVII & XVIII. Jakarta: Kencana, 2013.

Auda, Jasser. Maqasid al-Shariah as Philosophy of Islamic Law: A Systems Approach. London: The International Institute of Islamic Thought, 2008.

Burhani, Ahmad Najib. Pluralism, Liberalism, and Islamism: Religious Outlook of Muhammadiyah. Studia Islamika 25, no. 3 (2018): 433455.

Creswell, John W. Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches. 4th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 2014.

Hallaq, Wael B. A History of Islamic Legal Theories: An Introduction to Sunni Usul al-Fiqh. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.

Hallaq, Wael B. An Introduction to Islamic Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009.

Hidayat, Komaruddin. Ethics of Difference in Islamic Thought. Studia Islamika 24, no. 3 (2017): 389415.

Hodgson, Marshall G. S. The Venture of Islam. Vol. 1. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1974.

Kamali, Mohammad Hashim. Methodological Issues in Islamic Jurisprudence. Arab Law Quarterly 11, no. 1 (1996): 319.

Kamali, Mohammad Hashim. Tolerance and Pluralism in Islamic Law. Islam and Civilisational Renewal 2, no. 1 (2011): 2544.

Roy, Olivier. The Failure of Political Islam. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1994.

Syathibi, Abu Ishaq al-. Al-Muwafaqat fi Ushul al-Shariah. Jil. 2. Beirut: Dar al-Marifah, t.t.

Zed, Mestika. Metode Penelitian Kepustakaan. Jakarta: Yayasan Pustaka Obor Indonesia, 2018.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.