1. Home
  2. Vol 3, No 11 (2025)
  3. Sagita

Pertanggungjawaban Hukum Tenaga Medis Atas Kerugian Pasien Akibat Penggunaan Robot Medis

Author


Rois Sagita(1Mail), Yovita Arie Mangesti(2),
(1) University of August 17, 1945 Surabaya,
(2) ,

Mail Corresponding Author
Article Analytic
  [File Size: 342KB]  Language: en
Available online: 2025-12-16  |  Published : 2025-12-16
Copyright (c) 2025 Rois Sagita, Yovita Arie Mangesti
Article can trace at:

Article Metrics

Abstract Views: 20 times PDF Downloaded: 6 times

Abstract


Medical robots with artificial intelligence (AI) are becoming more and more common in Indonesian healthcare, yet there are currently no laws limiting their use or legal accountability. The purpose of this study is to examine medical professionals' legal responsibilities for patient losses resulting from the use of medical robots and examine the legal protections available to patients. Using a juridical-normative method, the study shows that medical personnel can still be held liable for negligence in the use of robots, while losses due to system failure or product defects are the responsibility of the manufacturer and healthcare facility. Patients have the right to protection through informed consent mechanisms, medical device oversight, and the right to sue for damages. This study emphasizes the need for specific regulations to provide legal certainty and stronger protection for patients.

Keywords


medical robots, legal liability, patient protection.

References


Asshiddiqie, J. (2010). Konstitusi dan Konstitusionalisme Indonesia. Sinar Grafika.

Journal of Medical Internet Research. (2024). A Review on Legal Issues of Medical Robots.

Jurnal Hukum Kesehatan Indonesia. (2025). Analisis Kekosongan Hukum Robotika Medis.

Shademan, A., et al. (2016). Supervised Autonomous Robotic Soft Tissue Surgery. Science Translational Medicine, 8(337), 337ra64.

Lanfranco, A. R., Castellanos, A. E., Desai, J. P., & Meyers, W. C. (2004). Robotic Surgery: A Current Perspective. Annals of Surgery, 239(1), 1421.

Franklin, B. D., OGrady, K., Donyai, P., Jacklin, A., & Barber, N. (2007). The Impact of a Closed-Loop Electronic Prescribing and Administration System on Prescribing Errors. Quality & Safety in Health Care, 16(4), 279284.

Char, D. S., Shah, N. H., & Magnus, D. (2018). Implementing Machine Learning in Health CareAddressing Ethical Challenges. New England Journal of Medicine, 378(11), 981983.

Setiawan, Y. (2024). Mediasi sebagai Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa Teknologi Kesehatan. Jurnal Arbitrase dan Hukum Bisnis, 2(3), 6079.

Santoso, H. (2023). Telemedicine dan Robotika Medis: Perspektif Hukum Indonesia. Jurnal Bioetika dan Regulasi Kesehatan, 4(2), 5574.

Springer. (2025). Legal Liability and Frameworks for AI-Powered Medical Robots.

Regulasi, Kebijakan, dan Dokumen Resmi

Kementerian PPN/Bappenas. (2025). Rencana Pembangunan Jangka Menengah Nasional (RPJMN) 20252029.

Kemenkes RI. (2025). Laporan Regulatory Sandbox AI Kesehatan 2025. Jakarta.

United Nations. (2025). Sustainable Development Goals Report 2025. Goal 3.

Republik Indonesia. (1999). Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1999 tentang Perlindungan Konsumen.

Republik Indonesia. (2004). Undang-Undang Nomor 29 Tahun 2004 tentang Praktik Kedokteran.

Kementerian Kesehatan Republik Indonesia. (2025). Peraturan Menteri Kesehatan Nomor 3 Tahun 2025 tentang Disiplin Profesi Tenaga Medis dan Tenaga Kesehatan.

Kode Etik Kedokteran Indonesia (KODEKI). (2012). IDI.

Konsil Kedokteran Indonesia. (2023). Tata Cara Pemeriksaan Disiplin MKDKI. Jakarta.

World Health Organization. (2011). Health Technology Assessment of Medical Devices.

Website / Sumber Daring

Intuitive Surgical. (n.d.). da Vinci Surgical System Overview. Diakses dari situs resmi Intuitive Surgical.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.