1. Home
  2. Vol 3, No 11 (2025)
  3. Salwa

Analisis Kasus Overmacht dan Pemutusan Kontrak Sepihak: Studi Putusan Nomor 672k/Pdt/2020 antara CV. Berlian Mas dan Pemerintah Daerah Kabupaten Trenggalek

Author


Rachel Amanda Salwa(1Mail), Restia Delya Ayu Chandra(2), Safa Aqila Ilzan(3), Sultan Athareza(4), Ummu Hani Sentosa(5), Wardani Rizkianti(6),
(1) Ilmu Hukum/Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Pembangunan Nasional “Veteran” Jakarta, Jalan RS. Fatmawati Raya, Pd. Labu, Kec. Cilandak, Kota Jakarta Selatan, DKI Jakarta, Indonesia 12450,
(2) ,
(3) ,
(4) ,
(5) ,
(6) ,

Mail Corresponding Author
Article Analytic
  [File Size: 430KB]  Language: en
Available online: 2025-12-12  |  Published : 2025-12-12
Copyright (c) 2025 Rachel Amanda Salwa, Restia Delya Ayu Chandra, Restia Delya Ayu Chandra
Article can trace at:

Article Metrics

Abstract Views: 22 times PDF Downloaded: 30 times

Abstract


The dispute between CV. Berlian Mas and the Regional Government of Trenggalek Regency, as reflected in Supreme Court Decision No. 672 K/Pdt/2020, stemmed from delays in the Plapar Bridge construction project, which the contractor attributed to flooding as a form of force majeure (overmacht). Although the contractor requested an extension of time, the regional government unilaterally terminated the contract without complying with the notification procedures required under the contract and procurement regulations. An assessment of Articles 1244–1245 of the Indonesian Civil Code shows that the flood did not objectively qualify as force majeure due to insufficient formal evidence and inadequate mitigation. The Supreme Court ruled that the termination constituted a breach of contract (wanprestasi), not a tort. This decision highlights the importance of strict proof of force majeure, adherence to the principle of pacta sunt servanda, and procedural compliance within government procurement contracts.

Keywords


Force Majeure; Breach; Contract; Overmacht; Procurement.

References


D. J. Rasuh, “Kajian Hukum Keadaan Memaksa (Force Majeure) Menurut Pasal 1244 dan Pasal 1245 Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata,” Lex Privatum 4, no. 2 (2016).

D.J. Rasuh, “Kajian Hukum Keadaan Memaksa,” Lex Privatum 4, No.2 (2016).

H. Triawan, “Pelanggaran Prosedur Hukum oleh Pejabat Pembuat Komitmen dalam Pengadaan Barang/Jasa,” Sosioedukasi: Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Pendidikan dan Sosial 11, no. 1 (2022): 22–39.

Indonesia, Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata (Burgerlijk Wetboek), Pasal 1313

Jane, Analisis Putusan Nomor 673 K/Pdt/2020 tentang Pemutusan Perjanjian Secara Sepihak pada Proyek Pembangunan Jembatan Plapar Berdasarkan Hukum Perjanjian, Skripsi Fakultas Hukum Universitas Indonesia, 2020.

Mahkamah Agung, Putusan No. 2172 K/Pdt/2006.

Putusan MA No. 1243 K/Pdt/2015 tentang Force Majeure Konstruksi.

R. Subekti, Hukum Perjanjian (Jakarta: Intermasa, 2005), 1.

Salim HS, Hukum Kontrak: Teori & Praktik (Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2003), 15.

Salim HS, Perkembangan Hukum Kontrak di Indonesia, 79.

W. Prodjodikoro, Asas-Asas Hukum Perjanjian (Bandung: Mandar Maju, 2000), 45.

W. Prodjodikoro, Asas-Asas Hukum Perjanjian (Bandung: Mandar Maju, 2000), 45.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.