Urgensi Penguatan Pengawasan Eksternal Yayasan Sebagai Bentuk Preventif Atas Penyalahgunaan Dana Yayasan (Studi Kasus Yayasan Aksi Cepat Tanggap)

Tiara Alfarissa, Muhammad Fauzan, Keren Shallom Jeremiah, Nicholas Christiansen, Lisa Angelie Putrie, Zahra Calista Herjendro, Mulyadi M

Abstract

Foundations are legal entities whose assets are separated to meet their goals and operate in three areas, namely social, religious and humanitarian. For example, with the goal of a foundation to pursue profit, it is precisely in this case that it also has great potential to commit or be open to committing such fraud. One of them is the Aksi Cepat Tanggap Foundation. The fact is that there are approximately 2 (two) trillion in funds managed by the Foundation and 103 (one hundred and three) billion found in the results of the investigation. The discussion that will become the basis and limitations of this research is explained by the formulation of the problem, namely, How are community fundraising foundations regulated in Indonesia?, and What are the forms of external supervision for fundraising foundations as a form of reducing the misuse of foundation funds This research was conducted using a normative juridical method with a Legislative Approach, Case Comparison, and Prescriptive Research. The results of the research show that the foundation law regarding the Indonesian supervisory board is still weak, because the provisions of the law do not explicitly state that people must come from outside or within the foundation. This can lead to legal smuggling and conflict of interest if there is no regulation on this matter. Oversight from the Attorney General is also passive. This passive supervision causes ineffectiveness in supervising all foundations in Indonesia, especially foundations engaged in public fundraising.

Keywords

Foundation, External Supervision, Misuse of Funds, aksi cepat tanggap foundation

Full Text:

PDF

References

Asshiddiqie, Jimly.Perkembangan dan Konsolidasi Lembaga Negara Pasca Reformasi, Setjen dan Kepaniteraan. MKRI.Cetakan Kedua : Jakarta. 2006, hlm 29

E, Daly.(2008). Pengawasan. Jakarta: Kencana, hlm. 23.

Fuady, Munir. Menata Bisnis Modern di Era Global.Bandung: PT Citra Aditya Bakt Yayasan lebih 2008, hlm 46.

H.S., Notonegoro.(2018). Supervision of Foundation Management Based on Law Number 28 of 2004 concerning Foundations. Jurnal Sosial dan Budaya Syar-I, 5(3): 283 – 284.

LA,Koele. (2016). The Dutch Private Foundation in Comparison with Trusts: For The Same Purpose but Rather Different. Trust & Trustees, 22(1): 142.

Indonesia, Undang-Undang Nomor 16 Tahun 2001, Ps.43 ayat (1).

Indonesia, Peraturan Menteri Sosial RI Nomor 8 Tahun 2021, Ps.1 angka (1). Indonesia, Peraturan Menteri Sosial RI Nomor 8 Tahun 2021, Ps.3 ayat (1) . Indonesia, Undang-Undang Nomor 16 Tahun 2001, Ps.40 ayat (3).

Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata (Burgelijk Wetboek Boek 2). Ps 297.

Muhammad, Rifa’i.Sejarah Pendidikan Nasional Dari Masa Klasik Hingga Modern.Ar- Ruzz Media: Jogjakarta.2011, hlm, 80.

S.P, Siagian.(2005). Fungsi-fungsi Manajerial, Edisi Revisi Cetakan Pertama. Jakarta.Bumi Aksara. hlm. 115.

Supramono, Gatot.Hukum Yayasan di Indonesia. Rineka Cipta:Jakarta.2008, hlm. 1.

Tami, Rusli.Sistem Badan Hukum Indonesia.CV Anugrah Utama Raharja 2013: Lampung, hlm 1 Tutik, Titik Triwulan.Hukum Perdata dalam Sistem Hukum Nasional. Prenada Media Group: Jakarta,hlm 40.

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.