Tinjauan Etika Mengenai Kode Etik Profesi Hakim Dalam Menggunakan Media Sosial
Abstract
With the rapid development of technology, it is now easier for people to communicate and find information, one of which is through social media. Social media has various types, advantages and disadvantages. The use of social media is not limited to a person's status, such as age, gender, religion or profession. Currently, many judges use social media to communicate, seek information and interact with the public. However, the use of social media by judges can affect public trust in the judiciary. In several countries, there are already rules and ways for judges to use social media properly and correctly. However, in Indonesia, the Code of Ethics and Code of Conduct for Judges (KEPPH) which has been in effect since 2009 does not regulate the use of social media by judges. Therefore, this research aims to assist the Supreme Court and the Judicial Commission in creating regulations or guidelines regarding the use of social media by judges, as well as assisting judges in using social media without violating the judge's professional code of ethics.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
E.Y. Kanter, Etika Profesi Hukum, (Jakarta: Storia Grafika, 2001);
H. Wildan Sayuthi Mustofa, Kode Etik Hakim; hukumonline.com/klinik/a/larangan-hakim-berkomentar-di-medsos-tentang-pilihan-politiknya,diakses 03 Desember 2023 Jurnal Konstitusi & Demokrasi, Vol. 2 [2022], No. 2, Art. 3;
M. Pwadi, “Jaga Indepensi Hakim dari Serangan Media Sosialâ€;
Samud, “Kode Etik Profesi Hakim Menurut Hukum Islam,†Jurnal Mahkamah Fakultas Syariah dan Ekonomi Islam IAIN Syekh Nurjati Cirebon, (Januari-Juni 2015); pn-curup.go.id/artikel/artikel-bermedia-sosial-dengan-bijak-yuk-sama-sama-fahami-uu-ite;
UNODC, “The Bangalore Principles of Judicial Conduct 2002,†https://www.unodc.org/pdf/crime/corruption/judicial_group/Bangalore_principles.pdf, diakses 25 Januari 2022.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.