1. Home
  2. Vol 4, No 7 (2025)
  3. Hanip

Pelatihan Penggunaan AI For Literature Review Untuk Guru di SDN 2 Merauke

Author


Rival Hanip(1Mail), Ferry Irawan(2),
(1) Jurusan Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar (PGSD), FKIP, Universitas Musamus Merauke, Indonesia,
(2) Jurusan Pendidikan Guru Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini (PG PAUD), FKIP, Universitas Musamus Merauke, Indonesia,

Mail Corresponding Author
Article Analytic
  [File Size: 290KB]  Language: en
Available online: 2025-10-27  |  Published : 2025-10-27
Copyright (c) 2025 Rival Hanip, Ferry Irawan
Article can trace at:

Article Metrics

Abstract Views: 48 times PDF Downloaded: 27 times

Abstract


PkM methods conducted community education methods. This method aims to improve the understanding and skills of primary education teachers on how to review journal articles using AI. This coaching goes through six steps, namely: coaching conducts coaching, coaching contains aspects of knowledge, skills, and attitudes, coaching is expected to demonstrate behavior change as well as real action and influence the quality improvement of primary education pipeline teachers. The stages carried out are shown in Chart 1. The results of the activities show that the use of AI is very important in improving the learning process and able to train teachers to be accustomed to using the technology needed in facilitating the learning process, so that the participants and learners in the classroom are very interested in the process of using teachers. conditioning learning by using renewable Technology.


Keywords


Training, Use of AI, Literature Review, Teachers in SDN 2 of Merauke

References


Burgoyne, K., Lervag, A., Malone, S., & Hulme, C. (2019). Speech difficulties at school entry are a significant risk factor for later reading difficulties. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 49, 4048. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2019.06.005

Finneran, M. L. (2017). Improving Scientific Literacy Through Reading Strategies: An Action Research Study. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses, 161. http://search.proquest.com.ezp.lib.unimelb.edu.au/docview/2021797283?accountid=12372

Fleischman, H. L., Hopstock, P. J., Pelczar, M. P., & Shelley, B. E. (2010). Highlights From PISA 2009 : Highlights From PISA 2009 : Context, 156.

Goyal, M., Gupta, C., & Gupta, V. (2022). A meta-analysis approach to measure the impact of project-based learning outcome with program attainment on student learning using fuzzy inference systems. Heliyon, 8(8), e10248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e10248

Green, C. (2019). A multilevel description of textbook linguistic complexity across disciplines: Leveraging NLP to support disciplinary literacy. Linguistics and Education, 53, 100748. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2019.100748

Hysa, E. (2014). Defining a 21st Century Education: Case Study of Development and Growth Course. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 3(7), 704709. https://doi.org/10.5901/mjss.2014.v5n2p41

Insa, L., Gonzalez, J., & Inesta, A. (2016). Discussing employability: Current perspectives and key elements from a bioecological model. Employee Relations, 38(6), 961974. https://doi.org/10.1108/CDI-08-2016-0135

Irawan, F. (2023). Media pembeljaran Vertiminaponik. In indonesia (Vol. 11, Issue 1).

Irawan, F., Zubaidah, S., Sulisetijono, & Astriani, M. (2021). Does Remap-STAD have the potential to promote students creative thinking skills. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2330(March). https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0043179

Kokshagina, O., Rickards, L., Steele, W., & Moraes, O. (2021). Futures literacy for research impact in universities. Futures, 132(February), 102803. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2021.102803

Mahanal, S., & Zubaidah, S. (2017). Model Pembelajaran Ricosre Yang Berpotensi Memberdayakan Keterampilan Berpikir Kreatif. Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, Dan Pengembangan, 2(5), 676685. https://doi.org/10.17977/JPTPP.V2I5.9180

Odegaard, M., Haug, B., Mork, S., & Sorvik, G. O. (2015). Budding Science and Literacy. A Classroom Video Study of the Challenges and Support in an Integrated Inquiry and Literacy Teaching Model. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 167(1877), 274278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.12.674

Prasmala, E. R., Zubaidah, S., Mahanal, S., Biologi, P., Pendidikan, P., Pascasarjana, B., & Negeri, U. (2013). PENERAPAN MODEL READING MAP GROUP INVESTIGATION ( GI ) UNTUK MENINGKATKAN KEMAMPUAN BERPIKIR KRITIS DAN HASIL BELAJAR BIOLOGI SISWA KELAS X SMA SURYA BUANA MALANG Implementation Reading Map Group Investigation ( GI ) to Improve Crical Thinking Skills and . January 2018, 835839.

Roessger, K. M., Daley, B. J., & Hafez, D. A. (2018). Effects of teaching concept mapping using practice, feedback, and relational framing. Learning and Instruction, 54(January), 1121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2018.01.011

Smith, S. A., Foster, M. E., Baffoe-Djan, J. B., Li, Z., & Yu, S. (2020). Unifying the current self, ideal self, attributions, self-authenticity, and intended effort: A partial replication study among Chinese university English learners. System, 95, 102377. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2020.102377

Tendrita, M., Mahanal, S., & Zubaidah, S. (2017). Pembelajaran Reading-Concept-Map Think Pair Share ( Remap Tps ) Dapat Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Kognitif. 2006, 763767.

Zahra, F., Zubaidah, S., Mahanal, S., & Astriani, M. (2021). The improvement of students argumentation skills through Remap-NHT learning model. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2330(March). https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0043291


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.