1. Home
  2. Vol 2, No 3 (2023)
  3. Hazmi

Pelatihan Pengukuran Kualitas Pengajar Berbasis Peran Pada Perguruan Tinggi

Author


Yusri Hazmi(1Mail), Teuku Zulkarnain(2), Faisal F(3), Anwar A(4), Aryati A(5), Faisal Faisal(6), Muhammad Nasir(7),
(1) Jurusan Tata Niaga. Politeknik Negeri Lhokseumawe, Indonesia
(2) Jurusan Tata Niaga. Politeknik Negeri Lhokseumawe,
(3) Jurusan Tata Niaga. Politeknik Negeri Lhokseumawe,
(4) Jurusan Tata Niaga. Politeknik Negeri Lhokseumawe,
(5) Jurusan Tata Niaga. Politeknik Negeri Lhokseumawe,
(6) Jurusan Tata Niaga. Politeknik Negeri Lhokseumawe,
(7) Jurusan Tata Niaga. Politeknik Negeri Lhokseumawe,

Mail Corresponding Author
Article Analytic
  [File Size: 175KB]  Language: en
Available online: 2023-06-06  |  Published : 2023-06-06
Copyright (c) 2023 Yusri Hazmi, Teuku Zulkarnain, Faisal F, Anwar A, Aryati A, Faisal Faisal, Muhammad Nasir
Article can trace at:

Article Metrics

Abstract Views: 293 times PDF Downloaded: 117 times

Abstract


Upaya meningkatkan kinerja akademik melalui peningkatan kualitas pengajaran, menjadi ukuran kualitas pengajaran, baik dalam bentuk kualifikasi pendidikan, pengalaman, dan metode pengajaran. Kegiatan ini berfokus pada implikasi pentingnya membuat konsep dan mengevaluasi kualitas pengajar, sehingga diperoleh ukuran yang jelas dan terstandar  dalam melakukan penilaian. Kegiatan ini penting dilakukan sebagai usaha untuk meningkatkan kapasitas profesionalisme pengajar, yang didasarkan pada konten pendidikan dan evaluasi pengajaran. Kegiatan ini menyimpulkan bahwa pengajar sebagai sumber daya paling bernilai yang tersedia di perguruan tinggi dan perlu dilakukan penilaian secara objektif. Ada kebutuhan untuk mendifinisikan dan mengukur kualitas pengajar, yang tertuang dalam kebijakan pengajaran. Kebijakan yang berfokus pada kebutuhan dalam melakukan peningkatan kapasitas dalam profesionalisme pengajar, yang tentunya menajdi bagian dari proses evaluasi, terutama berkaitan dengan tugas yang dilakukan pengajar. Kualitas pengajaran harus secara jelas terdefisnisikan dan terukur, sehingga penilaian dapat dilakukan secara objektif dan akuntabelitas.

Keywords


Kualitas Pengajar, Peran dan Pengukuran.

References


Macklin, J. (2006). Teaching standards: Recognising and rewarding quality teaching in public schools. Australian Labor Party. Available at: www.alp.org.au.

LaTrice-Hill, T. (2002). No Child Left Behind Policy Brief: Teaching quality. Denver, CO: Education Commission of the States. Available at: http://www.ecs.org/clearinghouse/.

Rowe, K.J., Stephanou, A., & Hoad, K-A. (2007). A Project to investigate effective ‘Third Wave’ intervention strategies for students with learning difficulties who are in mainstream schools in Years 4, 5 and 6. Final report to the Australian Government Department of Education, Science and Training. Camberwell, VIC: Australian Council for Educational Research.

Bond, L., Smith, T., Baker, W., & Hattie, J.A. (2000). The certification system of the National Board for Professional Teaching Standards: A construct and consequential validity study. Greensboro, NC: Center for Educational Research and Evaluation.

Rivkin, S.G., Hanusheck, E.A., & Kain, J.F. (2005). Teachers, schools, and academic achievement. Econometrica 73(2), 417-458.

Ingvarson, L.C., Elliott, A., Kleinhenz, E., & McKenzie, P. (2006). Accreditation of teacher education: A Review of national and international trends and practices in other professions. Report prepared for Teaching Australia (Australian Institute for Teaching and School Leadership Ltd). Available at: http://www.teachingaustralia.edu.au/ta/go/home/projects/teacheraccreditation.

Hopkins, D. (2007). Rights and obligations. Teacher: The National Education Magazine, pp 16-19. Melbourne: ACER.

Shulman, L.S. (1991). Final Report of the Teacher Assessment Project. Palo Alto: Stanford University.

Fenstermacher, G.D., & Richardson, V. (2005). On making determinations of quality in teaching. Teachers College Record, 107(1), 186-213.

Raudenbush, S.W. (2004). What are value-added models estimating and what does this imply for statistical practice? Journal of Educational and Behavioural Statistics, 29(1),

Kupermintz, H. (2002). Teacher effects as a measure of teacher effectiveness: Construct validity considerations in TVAAS (Tennessee Value-Added Assessment System). Centre of the Study of Evaluation Technical Report 563. Los Angels, CA: National Centre for Research on Evaluation, University of California.

DEST (2006) Attitudes to teaching as a career. Canberra, ACT: Australian Government Department of Education, Science and Training.

Hanushe Hart, P.D. & Teeter, M. (2002). A national priority: Americans speak on teacher quality. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.

Rowe, K.J. (2006). Effective teaching practices for students with and without learning difficulties: Constructivism as a legitimate theory of learning AND of teaching? Background paper to keynote address presented at the NSW DET Office of Schools Portfolio Forum, Wilkins Gallery, Sydney, 14 July 2006. Available at: http://www.acer.edu.au/research/programs/learningprocess.html.

Crocker, L. (1997). Assessing the content representativeness of performance assessment exercises. Applied Measurement in Education, 10, 83-95.

Jaeger, R.M. (1998). Evaluating the psychometric qualities of the National Board of Professional Teaching Standards' assessments: A methodological accounting. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 12(2), 189-210.

Scriven, M. (1994). Using the Duties-Based Approach to Teacher Appraisal. In L.C. Ingvarson and R. Chadbourne (Eds.), Valuing Teachers’ Work. Camberwell, VIC.: Australian Council for Educational Research (forthcoming).

Wheeler, P.H. (1994). Foundations upon which to build a teacher evaluation system (TEMP D Memo 18). Kalamazoo, MI: Western Michigan University, The Evaluation Centre, Centre for Research on Educational Accountability and Teacher Evaluation.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.