1. Home
  2. Vol 4, No 9 (2026)
  3. Sinurat

Analisis Penerapan Nilai Sila Keempat Pancasila dalam Aksi Demonstrasi BEM UI dan FMN

Author


Anisha Sinurat(1Mail), Dwika Marbun(2), Nisa Meliana Siburian(3), Nurul Arafah(4), Putri Henstyn Sihombing(5), Rofika Sari Tampubolon(6), Roganda Arta Pinondang Sihaloho(7),
(1) Program Studi Pendidikan Fisika, Jurusan Fisika, Fakultas Matematika dan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam, Universitas Negeri Medan,
(2) Program Studi Pendidikan Fisika, Jurusan Fisika, Fakultas Matematika dan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam, Universitas Negeri Medan,
(3) Program Studi Pendidikan Fisika, Jurusan Fisika, Fakultas Matematika dan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam, Universitas Negeri Medan,
(4) Program Studi Pendidikan Fisika, Jurusan Fisika, Fakultas Matematika dan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam, Universitas Negeri Medan,
(5) Program Studi Pendidikan Fisika, Jurusan Fisika, Fakultas Matematika dan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam, Universitas Negeri Medan,
(6) Program Studi Pendidikan Fisika, Jurusan Fisika, Fakultas Matematika dan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam, Universitas Negeri Medan,
(7) Program Studi Pendidikan Fisika, Jurusan Fisika, Fakultas Matematika dan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam, Universitas Negeri Medan,

Mail Corresponding Author
Article Analytic
  [File Size: 304KB]  Language: en
Available online: 2026-10-09  |  Published : 2026-10-09
Copyright (c) 2026 Anisha Sinurat, Dwika Marbun, Nisa Meliana Siburian, Nurul Arafah, Putri Henstyn Sihombing, Rofika Sari Tampubolon, Roganda Arta Pinondang Sihaloho
Article can trace at:

Article Metrics

Abstract Views: 4 times PDF Downloaded: 1 times

Abstract


Analysis of the Implementation of the Fourth Principle of Pancasila Values in the BEM UI and FMN Demonstration. This study aims to analyze the implementation of the fourth principle of Pancasila in the BEM UI and National Student Front (FMN) demonstration on 18 August 2026, particularly regarding freedom of expression, deliberation, representation, and security measures by the authorities. A qualitative approach with a case study method was used. Primary data were obtained through interviews with three informants (a security guard, a lecturer, and a teacher), while secondary data came from news reports and previous studies. The data were analyzed through data reduction, data presentation, and conclusion drawing. The results show that all three informants agreed that the communication deadlock between the government and students prolongs the demonstration and disrupts security and the economy, so the government should prioritize dialogue. Their views differed on the authorities' blocking of the crowd. It is concluded that the fourth principle has not been fully realized: freedom of expression was exercised, but an equal space for deliberation has not yet been formed. Open dialogue, humane and proportional security measures, and orderly criticism are needed.

Keywords


Pancasila; fourth principle; student demonstration; deliberation; freedom of expression

References


Aaisyah, S., & Fauzi, M. F. B. (2025). Comparison of the concept of Pancasila deliberations and consensus and Habermas' theory of communicative action in democratic discourse. Santhet (Jurnal Sejarah Pendidikan dan Humaniora), 9(1), 58–68. https://doi.org/10.36526/santhet.v9i1.4955

Azmi, M. S., Artamevira, Z. W., Ardiana, K. R., Tanjung, G. A., & Faisal, F. N. R. (2025). Analisis Aksi Demonstrasi Mahasiswa Indonesia Terhadap Kebijakan Dpr Yang Tidak Selaras Dengan Sila Keempat Pancasila Di Jakarta, Agustus 2025. Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisiplin Terpadu, 9(12), 2246–6111.

Fatlolon, C. (2023). Toward The Deepening of Democracy in Indonesia: A Habermasian Assessment of The Prospects and Problems of The General Election in Indonesia. In Budhi: A Journal of Ideas and Culture (Vol. 26, Number 2, pp. 187–206). https://doi.org/10.2991/978-2-38476-148-7_17

Hafidh, M. (2026, 18 Agustus). Delapan tuntutan demo BEM Universitas Indonesia (laporan: Vito Zabdiel). KedaiPena.Com. https://www.kedaipena.com/delapan-tuntutan-demo-bem-universitas-indonesia/

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.

Ninin Armianti Natsir, Santy Isma Handikasari, Nurul Fajriani, Ryan Asprimagama, Surez Taruna Pramata, & Insan Tajali Nur. (2025). Tindakan Represif Aparat Penegak Hukum dalam Aksi Unjuk Rasa terhadap Kebijakan Pemerintahan Prabowo dalam Perspektif Hak Asasi Manusia. Federalisme: Jurnal Kajian Hukum Dan Ilmu Komunikasi, 2(4), 77–88. https://doi.org/10.62383/federalisme.v2i4.1253

Pamungkas, M. B. (2026, 18 Agustus). Daftar 8 tuntutan demo BEM UI hari ini di Bundaran HI Jakarta. Kompas.com. https://megapolitan.kompas.com/read/2026/08/18/07464431/daftar-8-tuntutan-demo-bem-ui-hari-ini-di-bundaran-hi-jakarta

RiauPagi Media Cyber. (2026, 20 Agustus). BEM UI dan Front Mahasiswa Nasional gelar demo, 'yang minta hentikan penjajahan negara atas rakyat sendiri' (memuat laporan BBC News Indonesia oleh Quin Pasaribu dan Tri Wahyuni). RiauPagi.com. https://riaupagi.com/news/bem-ui-dan-front-mahasiswa-nasional-gelar-demo-di-bundaran-hi-mahasiswa-hentikan-penjajahan-negara-atas-rakyat-sendiri-202608203713/

Rizky Asydiqy. (2022). Sanksi Pidana Bagi Demonstran Yang Anarkis. Gorontalo Law Review Volume, 5(2), 354–360.

Saparina, A. S., & Dewi, D. A. (2021). Implementasi Nilai-Nilai Pancasila Melalui Praktik Kebebasan Berpendapat di Indonesia. Jurpis: Jurnal Pendidikan Ilmu Sosial, 18(1), 49–62.

Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945, Pasal 28E ayat (3).

Undang-Undang Nomor 9 Tahun 1998 tentang Kemerdekaan Menyampaikan Pendapat di Muka Umum.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.