Perbandingan Akreditasi Standar Nasional dan Internasional: Implikasi bagi Pengembangan Program Studi Pendidikan Agama Islam

Author


Rozaq Shohibul Ichsan(1Mail), Hanun Asrohah(2),
(1) Program Studi Pendidikan Agama Islam, Pascasarjana, Universitas Kiai Abdullah Faqih,
(2) Program Studi Pendidikan Agama Islam, Pascasarjana, Universitas Kiai Abdullah Faqih,

Mail Corresponding Author
Article Analytic
  [File Size: 247KB]  Language: en
Available online: 2026-09-09  |  Published : 2026-09-09
Copyright (c) 2026 Rozaq Shohibul Ichsan, Hanun Asrohah
Article can trace at:

Article Metrics

Abstract Views: 0 times PDF Downloaded: 0 times

Abstract


This study aims to examine and compare the national accreditation system managed by the National Accreditation Board for Higher Education (BAN-PT) with international accreditation standards such as AUN-QA, ABET, and other global accreditation bodies. The comparison covers assessment criteria, evaluation procedures, evaluation instruments, and their impact on the development of Islamic Religious Education (PAI) study programs in Indonesia. Using a qualitative approach with literature study and comparative analysis methods, the findings reveal significant differences between national standards, which are more regulation-oriented, and international standards, which emphasize outcomes-based education and global relevance. The study concludes that harmonization between both systems is essential for PAI programs to meet national quality standards while remaining globally competitive.

Keywords


Accreditation, BAN-PT, AUN-QA, National Standard, International Standard, Islamic Religious Education

References


ABET. Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs. Baltimore: ABET, 2023.

ASEAN University Network-Quality Assurance (AUN-QA). Guide to AUN-QA Assessment at Programme Level, Version 4.0. Bangkok: AUN-QA, 2020.

Badan Akreditasi Nasional Perguruan Tinggi (BAN-PT). Pedoman Akreditasi Program Studi. Jakarta: BAN-PT, 2019.

Harvey, Lee dan Diana Green. "Defining Quality." Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, Vol. 18, No. 1, 1993: 9–34.

International Network for Quality Assurance Agencies in Higher Education (INQAAHE). Guidelines of Good Practice in Quality Assurance. Dublin: INQAAHE, 2018.

Moleong, Lexy J. Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya, 2014.

Muhaimin. Pengembangan Kurikulum Pendidikan Agama Islam di Sekolah, Madrasah, dan Perguruan Tinggi. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada, 2005.

Mulyasa, E. Manajemen Berbasis Sekolah: Konsep, Strategi dan Implementasi. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya, 2011.

Muslich, Masnur. KTSP: Pembelajaran Berbasis Kompetensi dan Kontekstual. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara, 2008.

Nata, Abuddin. Ilmu Pendidikan Islam. Jakarta: Kencana, 2010.

Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia Nomor 5 Tahun 2020 tentang Akreditasi Program Studi dan Perguruan Tinggi.

Peraturan Menteri Riset, Teknologi, dan Pendidikan Tinggi Nomor 62 Tahun 2016 tentang Sistem Penjaminan Mutu Pendidikan Tinggi.

Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 4 Tahun 2014 tentang Penyelenggaraan Pendidikan Tinggi dan Pengelolaan Perguruan Tinggi.

QS World University Rankings. QS Top Universities Methodology. London: Quacquarelli Symonds, 2023.

Sudijono, Anas. Pengantar Evaluasi Pendidikan. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada, 2011.

Sugiyono. Metode Penelitian Pendidikan: Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta, 2017.

Tafsir, Ahmad. Ilmu Pendidikan dalam Perspektif Islam. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya, 2005.

Tilaar, H.A.R. Paradigma Baru Pendidikan Nasional. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta, 2004.

Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 12 Tahun 2012 tentang Pendidikan Tinggi.

World Bank. The Quality of Education in the Muslim World: Challenges and Opportunities. Washington D.C.: World Bank Publications, 2015.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.