Tanggung Gugat PT CIMB Niaga Auto Finance atas Perbuatan Melawan Hukum Pekerja

Author


Handyka Ilham Prastya(1Mail), Merline Eva Lyanthi(2),
(1) Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Surabaya,
(2) Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Surabaya,

Mail Corresponding Author
Article Analytic
  [File Size: 317KB]  Language: en
Available online: 2026-01-19  |  Published : 2026-01-19
Copyright (c) 2026 Handyka Ilham Prastya, Merline Eva Lyanthi
Article can trace at:

Article Metrics

Abstract Views: 21 times PDF Downloaded: 10 times

Abstract


This thesis analyzes the corporate legal liability or liability of PT CIMB Niaga Auto Finance (CNAF) for alleged Unlawful Acts (PMH) against its workers. This research is driven by the legal complications surrounding the problematic of Termination of Employment Relationships carried out by one party that is not procedural, which is specifically reflected in the Industrial Relations Court Decision at the Surabaya District Court Number 105/Pdt.Sus-PHI/2024/PN Sby. The purpose of this research is to analyze and understand the form of liability that must be borne by the company, as well as to assess the reasons for the judge's legal considerations in Decision No. 105/Pdt.Sus-PHI/2024/PN Sby. This study employs a normative legal research methodology linked to applicable legal regulations. The approaches used include the Statutory Approach, Conceptual Approach and Case Approach by analyzing Decision Number 105/Pdt.Sus-PHI/2024/PN Sby. The analysis results show that the unilateral termination of employment without valid proof of the alleged violation of the code of ethics by workers has fulfilled the components of Unlawful Acts (PMH) such as Article 1365 of the Civil Code. Thus, PT CIMB Niaga Auto Finance has liability for worker losses, both based on corporate liability and vicarious liability (employer's liability for the actions of subordinates) according to Article 1367 of the Civil Code. The judge's reason in the decision is considered to have applied the principle of progressive law, by affirming the company's liability and providing compensation, as an effort to realize substantive justice and protection for workers as a vulnerable party in industrial relations.

Keywords


Corporate Liability, Unlawful Act (PMH), Termination of Employment (PHK), Labor Law, Vicarious Liability

References


Alfianto, D., Rido, A., & Wijaya, G. V. (2024). Pertanggungjawaban Perdata dan Tanggung Gugat Dalam Perkara Wanprestasi Dan Perbuatan Melawan Hukum. Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat: Pemberdayaan, Inovasi dan Perubahan, 4(6).

Akbar, R. F. (2024). Pertanggungjawaban Perusahaan Terhadap Pekerja/Buruh Yang Melakukan Kelalaian Kerja. Lex Positivis, 2(8), 1001-1014.

Andreasari, A. D. (2023). Tanggung Gugat Prinsipal Terhadap Agen atas Perbuatan Melawan Hukum Diluar Kesepakatan Perjanjian Keagenan (Studi Putusan Nomor 1666 K/PDT/2022) (Doctoral dissertation, Universitas Islam Indonesia).

Angela, K. (2022). Tanggung Gugat Risiko Majikan atas Perbuatan Melanggar Hukum Bawahannya dalam Kecelakaan Lalu Lintas oleh Truk Tronton di Balikpapan: Siapakah yang Bertanggung Gugat dan Bagaimana Bentuk Ganti Kerugiannya?. Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis, 3(4), 314-326.

Apriani, T. (2019). Konsep Perbuatan Melawan Hukum Dalam Tindak Pidana. Ganec Swara, 13(1), 43-49.

Dr. Muhaimin, S.H., M.Hum : Metode Penelitian Hukum, 2020

Faiz, P. M. (2009). Teori Keadilan John Rawls (John Rawls' Theory of Justice). Jurnal Konstitusi, 6(1), 135-149.

Juarni, N. (2013). Tanggung Gugat Risiko Dari Majikan Atas Perbuatan Melanggar Hukum Pengemudi Yang Menjalankan Kendaraan Mil1k Perusahaan (Doctoral Dissertation, Universitas Airlangga).

Muttaqin, N. F. Z., & Latumahina, R. E. (2022). Tanggung Jawab Perusahaan Penyedia Jasa Terhadap Perbuatan Melanggar Hukum Pekerja Outsourcing di Tempat Kerja. Jurnal Inovasi Penelitian, 3(3), 5177-5184.

Pradesa, H. A., & Agustina, I. (2020). Implementasi Konsep Tanggung Jawab Sosial sebagai Upaya Meningkatkan Efektivitas Pengelolaan BUMDes. Jurnal Manajemen & Kewirausahaan, 8(2), 159-168.

Putri, M. D. (2024). Analisis Tanggung Gugat Bank atas Perbuatan Melawan Hukum Pegawai Bank yang Merugikan Nasabah (Studi Kasus Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 2600 K/Pdt/2022). Lex Patrimonium, 3(2), 8.

Sobon, K. (2018). Konsep tanggung jawab dalam filsafat Emmanuel Levinas. Jurnal Filsafat, 28(1), 47-73.

Sulistyawan, J. (2013). Tanggung Gugat Terhadap Perbuatan Melanggar Hukum Oleh Buruh Kontrak Yang Merugikan Pihak Ketiga (Doctoral Dissertation, Universitas Airlangga).

Wahyuni, W. S., & Harahap, D. A. (2018). Perjanjian Pembiayaan Jual Beli dengan Akad Murabahah (Bussan Auto Finance).

Widyantoro, V. G., & Kurniawan, F. (2020). Perkembangan Prinsip Dan Tanggung Gugat Dalam Kontrak Kerja Pekerjaan Konstruksi. Arena Hukum, 13(1), 157-180.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.