The Implications of International Law in the South Africa vs. Israel Case: An Analysis of the Genocide Convention and the Role of the International Court of Justice

Author


Nur Fadli S(1Mail), Mira Nila Kusuma Dewi(2), Alif Nunqy Bellatrix(3), Andi Risal(4), M. Fahril Hidayat(5), Fikram F(6), Fatrah F(7),
(1) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Indonesia Timur Makassar,
(2) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Indonesia Timur Makassar,
(3) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Indonesia Timur Makassar,
(4) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Indonesia Timur Makassar,
(5) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Indonesia Timur Makassar,
(6) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Indonesia Timur Makassar,
(7) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Indonesia Timur Makassar,

Mail Corresponding Author
Article Analytic
  [File Size: 297KB]  Language: en
Available online: 2025-12-27  |  Published : 2025-12-27
Copyright (c) 2025 Nur Fadli S, Mira Nila Kusuma Dewi, Alif Nunqy Bellatrix, Andi Risal, M. Fahril Hidayat, Fikram F
Article can trace at:

Article Metrics

Abstract Views: 22 times PDF Downloaded: 13 times

Abstract


International law is often perceived as an idealistic framework separate from the harsh realities of politics. The case of South Africa versus Israel at the International Court of Justice (ICJ) from late 2023 to early 2024 highlights the relevance of international legal principles amid armed conflict. This study analyzes the legal and political implications of the judicial process, focusing on the application of the 1948 Genocide Convention, the role of the International Court, and the limitations of global law enforcement. The analysis shows that although the ICJ lacks the military power to enforce its rulings, the international legal process exerts significant moral, political, and diplomatic pressure. The case also reinforces global accountability and underscores the importance of international humanitarian law principles in the context of complex armed conflicts.

Keywords


International Law, South Africa vs. Israel Case, Genocide, International Court of Justice

References


Bassiouni, M. C. (2013). International criminal law: Sources, subjects, and content. Brill.

Bassiouni, M. C. (2024). International criminal law and the ICJ: Genocide cases in contemporary conflicts. Oxford University Press.

Brown, L. (2022). Humanitarian law in Gaza: Challenges and precedents. International Review of Law, 39(1), 5580.

Cryer, R., Friman, H., Robinson, D., & Wilmshurst, E. (2019). An introduction to international criminal law and procedure (4th ed.). Cambridge University Press.

Dinstein, Y. (2017). War, aggression and self-defence (6th ed.). Cambridge University Press.

Forsythe, D. P. (2020). Human rights in international relations (4th ed.). Cambridge University Press.

Gordon, N. (2021). Israel and international law: Dynamics and dilemmas. Routledge.

International Court of Justice. (2024). Provisional measures in the case concerning the application of the Genocide Convention (South Africa v. Israel). ICJ Reports.

Israel Ministry of Foreign Affairs. (2023). Response to ICJ proceedings South Africa case.

Roberts, A. (2019). The law of war: International humanitarian law in war. Oxford University Press.

Scharf, M. P. (2015). Customary international law in times of armed conflict. Oxford University Press.

Shaw, M. N. (2021). International law (9th ed.). Cambridge University Press.

United Nations. (1948). Convention on the prevention and punishment of the crime of genocide. United Nations Treaty Series.

Permanent Court of Arbitration. (2024). Legal analysis of international genocide claims. The Hague: PCA.

Smith, J. (2023). The role of ICJ in modern conflicts. Journal of International Law, 45(2), 112138.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.