Inovasi Transportasi yang Kurang Inklusif Studi Kasus: Whoosh Kereta Cepat

Author


Ravi Azhar Syarief(1Mail), Riswanda R(2), Arron Rizq Hanan(3),
(1) Department of Public Administration, Faculty of Social and Political Science, University of Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa, Indonesia, Algeria
(2) ,
(3) ,

Mail Corresponding Author
Article Analytic
  [File Size: B]  Language: en   [File Size: 366KB]  Language: en
Available online: 2025-12-17  |  Published : 2025-12-17
Copyright (c) 2025 Ravi Azhar Syarief, Riswanda R, Arron Rizq Hanan
Article can trace at:

Article Metrics

Abstract Views: 27 times Untitled Downloaded: 0 times PDF Downloaded: 5 times

Abstract


This article examines the Whoosh High-Speed Rail project as a form of public service innovation that is officially framed as a symbol of national progress and technological modernization. Behind this narrative, however, various structural issues reveal a significant gap between innovation claims and the actual quality of public service experienced by society. This study aims to analyze whether Whoosh represents a citizen-oriented public service innovation or merely a symbolic and elitist form of development. The research employs a literature review method by analyzing policy documents, academic publications, and relevant media reports related to the planning, financing, and implementation of the project. The analysis is guided by Mulgan and Alburys public sector innovation framework, which emphasizes user orientation, public value creation, and sustainability. The findings indicate that Whoosh primarily reflects symbolic innovation, prioritizing political prestige and technological imagery over inclusive access and social equity. High ticket prices, weak intermodal integration, and fiscal risks demonstrate that this innovation deviates from the principles of public service as mandated by Law No. 25 of 2009 on Public Services.

Keywords


public service innovation, public policy, high-speed rail

References


Achmadi, R., & Widiarto, S. (2025). Investigating Customer Satisfaction on Whoosh High -Speed Train Services Using Importance Performance Analysis and Customer Satisfaction Index. Management Entrepreneurship and Social Science, 05(01).

Anggadwita, G. (2013). Service Innovation in Public Sector : A Case Study on PT. Kereta Api Indonesia. Journal of Social and Development Sciences, 4(7), 308315. https://doi.org/10.22610/jsds.v4i7.766

Daling, M. R. (2025, November 30). Rocky Gerung soal Proyek Kereta Cepat Whoosh: Bukan Kebutuhan Rakyat Indonesia, Hanya Bangun Relasi dengan China. ARAHPUBLIK.COM, 13. https://www.arahpublik.com/berita-publik/1256895160/rocky-gerung-soal-proyek-kereta-cepat-whoosh-bukan-kebutuhan-rakyat-indonesia-hanya-bangun-relasi-dengan-china

Dila, E. (2019). Kualitas pelayanan publik. Jurnal Administrasi Publik, 1, 1528. http://repository.unair.ac.id/id/eprint/97696

Elisha, J., & Tapiheru, S. (2024). Dinamika Politik Ruang di Balik Mega Proyek Belt and Road Initiative: Studi Kasus Kereta Cepat Jakarta - Bandung (WHOOSH) SARAH MUMTAZ, Joash Elisha Stephen Tapiheru, S.I.P., M.A., Ph.D.

Fadilah, R. F., & Abdul Qodir Jaelani. (2023). Development of Jakarta-Bandung Fast Rail Infrastructure. Social Impact Journal, 2(2), 2737. https://doi.org/10.61391/sij.v2i2.65

Fatmadila, A. A., Alfadhil, F. A., Juliana, N. P., Pratama, N. A. P., Adiwijaya, R. T. R., & Akbar, I. A. Al. (2024). Persepsi Masyarakat Terhadap Transportasi Kereta Cepat Jakarta-Bandung Melalui Platform Quora. 5, 4855.

Hakim, G., Fatyanosa, T. N., & Widodo, A. W. (2024). Analisis Sentimen Masyarakat terhadap Kereta Cepat Whoosh pada Platform X menggunakan IndoBERT. 8(10), 110.

Hayati, A., Sulaksana, R. M. T., Wardani, A. M. C., & Raharja, A. (2025). Evaluation of the Success of Transportation Infrastructure Renewal Projects: Case Study of the Jakarta-Bandung High-Speed Train Development. Journal of Renewable Engineering. https://doi.org/10.62872/d36tjv51

Hikmawan, M. D., & Hidayat, R. (2016). DEPOLITICISATION OF PUBLIC ISSUE:LOW DEGREE OF GOVERNMENTS DEMOCRATIC LEGITIMACY (The Case of the Reclamation Policy of Benoa Bay, Bali, Indonesia). Journal of Governance, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.31506/jog.v1i1.1311

Makmuri, A. (2017). Infrastructure and inequality: An empirical evidence from Indonesia. Economic Journal of Emerging Markets, 9(1), 2939. https://doi.org/10.20885/ejem.vol9.iss1.art4

Nugraha, A. T., Prayitno, G., Situmorang, M. E., & Nasution, A. (2020). The role of infrastructure in economic growth and income inequality in Indonesia. Economics and Sociology, 13(1), 102115. https://doi.org/10.14254/2071-789X.2020/13-1/7

Oktopiani, L. (2024). KEWENANGAN PEMERINTAH DAERAH DALAM URUSAN PEMERINTAHAN DI BIDANG LINGKUNGAN HIDUP DALAM PENYELESAIAN KERUSAKAN LINGKUNGAN HIDUP AKIBAT PROYEK KERETA CEPAT WHOOSH DI KABUPATEN PURWAKARTA. 119, 298316.

Purba, A. (n.d.). KERETA CEPAT JAKARTA BANDUNG : INOVASI TEKNOLOGI. Independen, 130.

Rahmat Alim, R. M. (2025). Financial Sustainability of KCIC Whoosh in the Ramp-Up Phase : A Narrative Review Based on IDX and Global HSR Benchmarks. 2(211), 168178.

Rail, W. H., Abdul, C., Wahpiyudin, B., & Sumarwan, U. (2025). RIDE IT OR MISS OUT : UNPACKING CONSUMER BEHAVIOR INTENTIONS FOR. 23(1), 125.

Rudianto, R. (2024). Reformasi birokrasi dan pelayanan publik. Gender, Human Development, and Economics, 1(2), 5366. https://doi.org/10.61511/ghde.v1i2.2024.1161

Salim, I. P., Simanjuntak, M. R. A., Sulistio, H., Doktor, P., Sipil, T., Tarumanagara, U., Petamburan, G., Barat, J., Besar, G., Proyek, M., Universitas, K., & Harapan, P. (2023). Pengembangan Kereta Cepat Di Indonesia Dan. Wahana TEKNIK SIPIL, 28, 115130.

Sanjaya, J., Priyatna, B., & Hilabi, S. S. (2024). Analisis Sentimen Terhadap Opini Proyek Kereta Cepat Menggunakan Metode Nave Bayes Classifier. 14(1), 263270.

Setiawan, A., Usni, Hamka, & Salsabila, F. (2025). KERJASAMA INDONESIA DAN KERETA CEPAT JAKARTA-BANDUNG. Mutiara Publishing Indonesia.

Silalahi, B. (2025). WHOOSH IN THE PERSPECTIVE OF PUBLIC SERVICE: Between State Mission and Policy Misformulation. 17.

Sinollah, & Masruro, 2019. (2019). Based on path analysis, service quality variables have no direct or indirect influence on customer loyalty. The direct influence on customer loyalty in this study is customer satisfaction. Journal of Dialectics, 4(1), 4564.

Sitorus, B. (2024). Strategi Kompetitif Penyediaan Angkutan Lanjutan Kereta Cepat Jakarta-Bandung Dalam Meningkatan Minat Pengguna. Jurnal Perkeretaapian Indonesia (Indonesian Railway Journal), 8(2), 17. https://doi.org/10.37367/jpi.v8i2.323

Syaifur Rohman, M. (2025). A Study of Governance and Public Participation in Indonesian Megaprojects: A Comparative Analysis with International Practices. Jurnal Planologi, 22(1), 18299172.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.