1. Home
  2. Vol 3, No 10 (2025)
  3. Ashadi

Utilizing ChatGPT within the Cybergogy Model to Optimize Self-Directed Learning in the Instructional Multimedia Course at PTIK

Author


Ninik Rahayu Ashadi(1Mail),
(1) Universitas Negeri Makassar,

Mail Corresponding Author
Article Analytic
  [File Size: 376KB]  Language: en
Available online: 2025-12-01  |  Published : 2025-12-01
Copyright (c) 2025 Ninik Rahayu Ashadi
Article can trace at:

Article Metrics

Abstract Views: 15 times PDF Downloaded: 5 times

Abstract


This study aims to identify how ChatGPT, as an artificial intelligence technology, is utilized to support students self-directed learning in the Instructional Multimedia course. The research employed a descriptive quantitative approach, which systematically and factually describes the phenomenon of ChatGPT utilization within the Cybergogy model to support self-directed learning among PTIK students in the Multimedia Learning course. The population in the class serving as the research subject consisted of 32 students. Based on the results, viewed from several aspects: Engagement (Digital Involvement) shows that ChatGPT is highly helpful in understanding Multimedia Learning materials (mean 4.55) and increases learning motivation due to quick access to explanations and examples. In the aspect of Empowerment (Self-Directed Learning Empowerment), ChatGPT is very effective in generating ideas and inspiration for multimedia design (mean 4.48) and helps students complete tasks independently while still ensuring personal understanding. In the Enhancement (Improvement and Reflection) aspect, ChatGPT enhances the depth of understanding regarding multimedia design principles. In the aspect of Ethical & Critical Use, students are aware of using ChatGPT as a support tool rather than a substitute for their own thinking.The study concludes that the utilization of ChatGPT within the Cybergogy Model effectively optimizes self-directed learning in the Instructional Multimedia course at PTIK, viewed through four aspects: (1) Engagement, (2) Empowerment, (3) Enhancement, and (4) Ethical & Critical Use. The overall mean score obtained was 4.316, with the majority category being very high.

Keywords


Utilization, ChatGPT, Cybergogy Model, Self-Directed Learning.

References


Banafi, A., & Garcia, M. (2023). Exploring the role of ChatGPT as a learning assistant in higher education. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 26(2), 4558.

Benta, D., Bologa, G., & Dzitac, S. (2014). E-learning platforms in higher education: An analysis of quality assurance models. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 878882.

Cilliers, E. J. (2017). The challenge of teaching Generation Z. People: International Journal of Social Sciences, 3(1), 188198.

Clark, R. C., & Mayer, R. E. (2016). E-Learning and the Science of Instruction (4th ed.). Wiley.

Cotton, D. R. E., Cotton, P. A., & Shipway, J. R. (2023). Chatting and cheating: Ensuring academic integrity in the era of ChatGPT. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 60(2), 112.

Holmes, W., Bialik, M., & Fadel, C. (2019). Artificial Intelligence in Education: Promises and Implications for Teaching and Learning. Center for Curriculum Redesign.

Hodges, C., Moore, S., Lockee, B., Trust, T., & Bond, A. (2020). The difference between emergency remote teaching and online learning. EDUCAUSE Review.

Kasneci, E., et al. (2023). ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education. Learning and Individual Differences, 103, 102274.

Luckin, R. (2018). Machine Learning and Human Intelligence: The Future of Education for the 21st Century. UCL IOE Press.

Mayer, R. E. (2014). The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.

Mulyana, E. (2021). Implementasi model pembelajaran cybergogy dalam meningkatkan literasi digital mahasiswa pendidikan vokasi. Jurnal Pendidikan Teknologi dan Kejuruan, 27(2), 99110.

Pintrich, P. R. (2004). A conceptual framework for assessing motivation and self-regulated learning in college students. Educational Psychology Review, 16(4), 385407.

Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants. On the Horizon, 9(5), 16.

Rudolph, J., Tan, S., & Tan, S. (2023). ChatGPT: Bullshit spewer or the end of traditional assessments in higher education? Journal of Applied Learning & Teaching, 6(1), 122.

Schunk, D. H., & Zimmerman, B. J. (2012). Motivation and Self-Regulated Learning: Theory, Research, and Applications. Routledge.

Suartama, I. K., Setyosari, P., & Sulton. (2020). Development of cyberlearning model to improve critical thinking skills in higher education. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 19(3), 5665.

Sutrisno. (2020). Problem solving skill mahasiswa dalam pembelajaran berbasis proyek. Jurnal Pendidikan Teknologi, 22(1), 4452.

Suprihatiningrum, J. (2016). Strategi Pembelajaran: Teori & Aplikasi. Ar-Ruzz Media.

Wang, M., & Kang, M. (2006). Cybergogy for engaged learning: A framework for creating learner engagement through ICT. In D. Hung & M. S. Khine (Eds.), Engaged Learning with Emerging Technologies (pp. 225253). Springer.

Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Becoming a self-regulated learner: An overview. Theory Into Practice, 41(2), 6470.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.