Perbandingan Waktu Capaian Tes Motorik Menggunakan Spinal Needle No. 25 dan No. 27g Pada Pasien Sectio Caesaria Dengan Spinal Anestesi di RSUD Sambas

Author


Anggiatwan A(1Mail), Rahmaya Nova Handayani(2), Roro Lintang Suryani(3),
(1) Universitas Harapan Bangsa, Program Studi Keperawatan Anestesiologi Program Sarjana Terapan, Indonesia
(2) ,
(3) ,

Mail Corresponding Author
Article Analytic
  [File Size: 300KB]  Language: en
Available online: 2025-03-20  |  Published : 2025-03-20
Copyright (c) 2025 Anggiatwan A
Article can trace at:

Article Metrics

Abstract Views: 49 times PDF Downloaded: 36 times

Abstract


Spinal anesthesia is the most widely chosen anesthesia technique and is performed in lower extremity, anorectal, urology, obstetrics and gynecology, and lower abdominal surgery. This procedure is chosen by anesthesiologists and patients because it has the advantage of being able to provide anesthesia and analgesia effects together, prevent serious respiratory complications from general anesthesia, and a high level of patient satisfaction (Dwiputra, 2023). General Objective To determine the comparison of the timing of the motor test using spinal needle number 25 and number 27G in Sectio Caesaria patients with spinal anesthesia. This research is included in Quantitative research. The type of research used is observational analysis with a Cross Sectional approach. The number of samples was enlisted from two groups where respondents using a 25G spinal needle consisted of 85 respondents and respondents who used a 27G spinal needle consisted of 85 respondents. Based on the results obtained from the 2 sample groups used, in the sample of respondents who were carried out spinal anesthesia using a 25 G needle, the motor achievement time was 3.44 minutes and in the sample of respondents who were carried out spinal anesthesia using a 27 G needle for 3.10 minutes. Results Difference in the time of achievement of motor tests using spinal needle no. 25 and no. 27G in patients with sectio caesarean section with spinal anesthesia with the analysis test The data used in this study was a data test with Man-Whitney where the results in the data test stated a Sig value of 0.001 which means a sig value of <0.05 so it can be concluded that there is a significant difference between the two groups.

Keywords


Motor Test Achievement Time, Spinal Needle Size, Spinal Anesthesia

References


Amin, N. F., Garancang, S., & Abunawas, K. (2023). Konsep Umum Populasi dan Sampel dalam Penelitian. Jurnal Pilar, 14(1), 1531.

Anasyi, N., Arsani, F., & Mustoha, M. (2022). Perbandingan Penggunaan Adjuvant Fentanyl 25g Dan Klonidine 50g Pada 10mg Bupivacain 0 , 5 % Hiperbarik Terhadap Lama Kerja Blokade Sensorik Motorik Spinal Anestesi.

Anshori, & Iswati. (2019). Metodologi penelitian kuantitatif (Edisi 1). Airlangga University Press.

Aris. (2022). Pengertian Populasi: Karakteristik dan Faktor yang Mempengaruhinya.

Dwiputra, A. G. (2023). Komplikasi Pasca Anestesia Spinal: Apa saja yang harus kita waspadai? Majalah Anestesia & Critical Care, 41(1), 13. https://doi.org/10.55497/majanestcricar.v41i1.316

Ghanei, M. M., & Mehraban, M. S. (2015). Comparison of the 25, 26 and 27 gauge needles for spinal anesthesia. Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences, 18(6), 290294. https://doi.org/10.3923/pjbs.2015.290.294

Keenan, L. (2021). Rising rates suggest increasing numbers of medically unnecessary, potentially harmful procedures.

Lawren, C. T., & Hepner David L. (2006). Needles used for spinal anesthesia.

Majid et al. (2011). Keperawatan PerioperatifNo Title. Gosyen Publishing.

Margaret. (2021). Melahirkan Normal dan Operasi Caesar: Kelebihan Serta Kekurangan.

Morgan. (2013). Clinical Anesthesiology (Fifth Edit).

Muhammad Jalaluddin Assuyuthi Chalil. (2019). Flush Cairan pada Jarum Spinal 27-Gauge Tipe Quincke Mempercepat Waktu Munculnya Cerebrospinal Fluid (CSF) sebagai Penanda Keberhasilan Mencapai Ruang Subarakhnoid pada Tindakan Anestesi Spinal .

Notoatmojo. (2012). Metode Penelitian Kesehatan. Rineka Cipta.

Notoatmojo. (2017). Metode Penelitian Kesehatan. PT Rineka Cipta.

Nursalam. (2016). Metodologi Penelitian Ilmu Keperawatan. Salemba Medika.

Orami Articles. (2024). Artikel Seputar Parenting, Kesehatan, Gaya Hidup dan Hiburan itle.

Putu Agus. (2023). Pembiusan pada Operasi SC.

Riset Kesehatan Dasar. (2018). Badan Penelitian dan Pengembangan Kesehatan Kementerian RI tahun 2018.

Riyadh Firdaus, A. H. M. R. B. (2022). Perbandingan Rasio Lingkar Leher Terhadap Jarak Tiromental dengan Skor Mallampati dan Jarak Tiromental Sebagai Prediktor Kesulitan Visualisasi Laring pada Pasien Bedah Elektif Di RSUPN Cipto Mangunkusumo.

Sugiyono. (2018). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta.

Sugiyono. (2019). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif Kualitatif dan R&D. Alfabeta.

Yuliastrin, A., Fazila, A., Damanik, S., & Vebrianto, R. (2023). Pengembangan Instrumen Berpikir Kritis : Tutor Identifikasi Berpikir Kritis Development of Critical Thinking Instruments: Critical Thinking Identification Tutor. Jurnal Sainsmart, XII(1), 112.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.