Author
Feni Helmila(1
(1) Universitas Islam Negeri Sjech M. Djamil Djambek Bukittinggi, Indonesia,
(2) ,
| Article Analytic |
Available online: 2025-01-21 | Published : 2025-01-21
Copyright (c) 2025 Feni Helmila, Wedra Aprison
Article can trace at:
Article Metrics
Abstract Views: 43 times
PDF Downloaded: 34 times
Abstract
This research was motivated by several problems that the author found in class V of SDN 27 Ladang Hutan Baso. In the learning process there are students who are less actively involved in carrying out learning, such as many students who have difficulty understanding PAI learning, lack of student activity both physically and cognitively, monotonous learning, lack of student understanding of the material being studied, lack of student courage when appearing in front class, lack of student discipline in learning, learning is still teacher-centered which causes students to tend to be less active, and there are still many class V students who have not achieved maximum learning results so the quality of learning must be improved further. This research is a type of quantitative research with experimental methods. This research was located at SDN 27 Ladang Hutan Baso. The population in this study was 57 students. And the sample in this study was 38 students. The sampling technique used is random sampling technique. The instruments used in this research are tests and documentation. Based on the results of the analysis and discussion of the research data obtained regarding the influence of the Contextual Teaching Learning learning model, which is very influential on student learning outcomes in PAI subjects with a T-test calculation with a significance of 5% as can be seen if sig (2-tailed = 0.378) > 0.05 then H_o is accepted and H_a is rejected. So it can be concluded that there is an influence of the contextual teaching learning model on student learning outcomes in PAI subjects at SDN 27 Ladang Hutan Baso. It is known that the average score for the control class is 83 and the average score for the experimental class is 85.
Keywords
References
A. Saepul Hamdani. (2003). Contextual Teaching and Learning (CTL) pada Pembelajaran PAI, (Nizamia: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pemikiran Islam. Vol. 6. No. 20).
Afandi Muhammad, 2013. Model Dan Metode Pembelajaran Disekolah. Semarang : UNISSULA Press
Ali, Ismun, 2021. pembelajaran contextual teaching learning dalam pengajaran pendidikan agama islam, jurnal mubtadiin. vol. 7 no 01.
Ahmad Zayadi dan Abdul Majid, Tadzkirah. (2005). Pembelajaran Pendidikan Agama Islam (PAI), Jakarta: Rajagrafindo Persada.
Ana Widyastuti, Suvriadi Panggabean, 2021. konsep Dan Strategi Pembelajaran. Yayasan kita menulis.
Anwar, Qomari. (2003). Pendidikan Sebagai Karakter Budaya Bangsa, Jakarta: UHAMKA Press Asmani, Jamal. (2012). 7 Tips Aplikasi Pakem, Jogjakarta: Diva Press.
Aqib Zainal,2013.Model-model, media, dan strategi pembelajaran konstekstual (inovatif), Bandung : Yrama Widya.
Badruzaman, Ahmad. (2006). Strategi dan Pendekatan dalam Pembelajaran, Yogyakarta: Ar Ruuz
Charles, Supriadi, Aliah Syahira, Pengaruh Penerepan Strategi Pembelajaran
Active Learning Tipe Guided Teaching Terhadap Hasil Belajar Akidah Akhlak Di MAN 2 Payakumbuh, Koloni : Jurnal Mutidisiplin Ilmu, 1 (3), 2022.
Conny Setiawan. (1992). Pendekatan Keterampilan Proses, Jakarta: PT Gramedia.
Departemen Agama RI. (2010). Al-Quran dan Terjemahnya, Jakarta: Depag RI.
Depdiknas. (2003). Pendekatan Konstektual (Contextual Teaching and Learning). Jakarta: Ditjen Dikdasmen.
Hanafiah, Nanang dan Cucu Suhana. 2009. Konsep Strategi Pembelajaran. Bandung: PT. Refika Aditama.
Kaelan, dan Achmad Zubaidi. 2007. Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan untukPerhuruan Tinggi. Yogyakarta: Paradigma.
Komalasari Kokom. 2011. Pembelajaran Kontekstual Konsep dan Aplikasi. Bandung: PT RafikaAditama
Made Wena. 2009. Strategi Pembelajaran Inovatif Kotemporer Suatu Tinjauan Konseptual Operasional. Jakarta: PT. Bumi Aksara.
Mudjidjo. 1995. Tes Hasil Belajar. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara. Muslich Mansur. 2011. PendidikanKarakter. Jakarta :BumiAksara
Muhiddinur Kamal, Ririta,2022. strategi pembelajaran dalam pencpaian kriteria ketuntasan minal mata pelajaran PAI di SMP negeri 32 sijunjung. volume 6 no 1.
Nana Sudjana. 1989. PenilaianHasilProsesBelajarMengajar. Bandung: PT RemajaRosdakarya.
Noor Ms Bakry. 2009. Pendidikan Agama Islam. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar
Ruminiati, 2012 Bahan Ajar Pengembangan PAI 1. Disajikan dalam perkuliahan yang dilaksanakan di Jurusan PGSD Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan. Unismuh Makassar.
Rusman. 2016. Model-Model Pembelajaran Mengembangkan Profesionalisme Guru. Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada.
Suprijono Agus. 2013. Cooperative Learning Teori & aplikasi PAIKEM. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Slameto. 2003. Belajar dan faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhinya. Jakarta: PT Sugiono (2010:81) Rineka Cipta
Sanjaya, Wina. 2009. Faktor faktor yang Mempengaruhi Hasil Belajar. Jakarta: Prenada
Shoimin, Aris. 2016. 68 Model Pembelajaran Inovatif dalam kurikulum 2013. Yogyakarta: Ar-ruzz media.
Sugiyono. 2016.Metode Penelitian Pendidikan Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, Dan R&D.Bandung:Alfabeta
Sugiyono. 2013.Metode Penelitian Pendidikan Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, Dan R&D.Bandung:Alfabeta Subagyo, Joko. 2004.Metode Penelitian Dalam Teori dan Praktek. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Subana dan Sudrajat 2001.Dasar-Dasar Penelitian Ilmiah. Bandung: CV Pustaka Setia.
Takdir Aidir. 2015. Peningkatan Hasil Belajar Murid Dalam Mata Pelajaran PAI Siswa Melalui Pendekatan CTL (Contextual Teaching and Learning) pada kelas V SD Inpres Bertingkat Sungguhminasa Kabupaten Gowa. Skripsi tidak diterbitkan.Makassar: Unismuh Makassar.
Tirtarahardja, Umar, dan La Sulo. 2010. Pengantar Pendidikan. Jakarta: Rimeka Cipta
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.








