Sarana Berfikir Ilmiah

Author


Rismah R(1Mail),
(1) Konsentrasi Hukum Islam/Syariah, Program Studi Dirasah Islamiyah, Pascasarjana Uin Alauddin, Makassar,

Mail Corresponding Author
Article Analytic
  [File Size: 457KB]  Language: en
Available online: 2025-01-19  |  Published : 2025-01-19
Copyright (c) 2025 Rismah R
Article can trace at:

Article Metrics

Abstract Views: 49 times PDF Downloaded: 131 times

Abstract


In this information age, where access to information is very broad, a good understanding of scientific thinking tools is essential. Mastery of these tools helps one think critically, analytically, and systematically when faced with new or complex information. It also allows one to distinguish between valid information and biased or unfounded information. Thus, scientific thinking tools are not only important for scientists or researchers, but also for the wider community as part of higher literacy education and as a tool to understand the world in a more objective and measurable way. Mastery of various scientific thinking tools opens the door to broader knowledge and enables more impactful and sustainable progress in science and technology. The results of this study indicate that scientific thinking tools are a series of tools and methods used to achieve an objective and systematic understanding of a phenomenon. Scientific thinking requires a structure that can be tested, repeated, and measured, allowing scientists or researchers to reach reliable conclusions. Various types of scientific thinking tools include several important aspects that support each other in the process of reasoning and analysis. First, logic is a basic tool to ensure consistency in scientific reasoning. The use of deductive logic, which goes from the general to the specific, and inductive logic, which moves from the specific to the general, helps scientists draw conclusions based on coherent rules and avoid contradictions. For example, through deductive logic, a scientist can conclude certain phenomena based on basic principles that have been proven to be true.


Keywords


Logic, Science, Technology

References


Buyung dan Nunu Burhanudin Revorma: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pemikiran Sarana Berfikir Ilmiah (Bahasa, Logika, Matematika dan Statistik, vol. 3, No. 1 (April 2023) https://ejournal-revorma.sch.id/index.php/mansa/article/download/38/32/206 (Diakses 30 Oktober 2023)

Latif, Mukhtar. Orientasi ke Arah Filsafat Ilmu (Jakarta: Kencana Prenadamedia Group, 2014) h. 255.

Mundiri, Logika (Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo Persada, 2008), h. 1.

Muslih, Mohammad. Filsafat Ilmu, Kajian atas Asumsi Dasar, Paradigma dan Kerangka Teori Ilmu Pengetahuan, cet. 2 ( Yogyakarta: Belukar 2025), h. 102

Ridwan dan Sunarto, Pengantar Statistika Untuk Penelitian: Pendidikan, Sosial, Komunikasi, Ekonomi dan Bisnis (Bandung: Alfabeta, 2011), h. 3

Sudijono. Anas, Pengantar Statistik Pendidikan, Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada, 2010.

Sumarna, Cecep, Filsafat Ilmu, Bandung: Mulia Press, 2008.

Sumarni, Eneng. dkk, Jurnal Pendidikan Berkarakter, Sarana Berfikir Ilmiah, vol. 1. No. 4. (Agustus 2023), https://doi.org/10.51903/pendekar.v1i4.299 (Diakses 30 Oktober 2024).

Suriasumantri, Jujun S. Filsafat Ilmu, Sebuah Pengantar Populer, Jakarta: Pustaka Sinar Harapan 2010.

Tim Dosen Filsafat Ilmu UGM, Filsafat Ilmu Sebagai Dasar Pengembangan Ilmu Pengetahuan (Yogyakarta: Liberty 2020).


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.