Exploration of Students Challenges and Solutions: A Qualitative Description of The Learning Process In Creating Tree Diagrams for Prospective English Language Teachers

Author


Putri Adinda Pratiwi(1Mail), Fahima Mashalani(2), Maulia Hafizhah(3), Nur Hapsi Harahap(4), Siti Ismahani(5),
(1) Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara,
(2) Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara,
(3) Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara,
(4) Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara,
(5) Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara,

Mail Corresponding Author
Article Analytic
  [File Size: 319KB]  Language: en
Available online: 2024-01-08  |  Published : 2024-01-08
Copyright (c) 2024 Putri Adinda Pratiwi, Fahima Mashalani, Maulia Hafizhah, Nur Hapsi Harahap, Siti Ismahani
Article can trace at:

Article Metrics

Abstract Views: 133 times PDF Downloaded: 102 times

Abstract


The use of tree diagrams serves as a valuable tool for students to grasp the structure of a sentence and conduct analyses based on both its surface and deep structures. Proficiency in creating syntactic tree diagrams can be employed as an indicator of a student's ability to scrutinize sentences and their structures comprehensively. While conducting this research, We found a lot of articles about tree diagrams in syntax. However, we haven't seen many articles that discuss students' challenges and solutions when learning tree diagrams, particularly for teachers. This research used descriptive and qualitative methods. We conducted interviews, both directly or through messages, with a few participants from the same department at a University. In this research, researchers took 6 student participants. Categorization challenges emerge as a central concern, with participants highlighting the difficulty in identifying and categorizing words within a sentence. This underscores the necessity for learners to develop a robust grasp of parts of speech and their respective functions in constructing meaningful tree diagrams


Keywords


Challenges, Solutions, Tree Diagrams

References


Bresnan, J. (2008). Cross-linguistic comparisons and Theory Integration. In The Handbook of the Biolinguistic Perspective on Language Development (pp. 593-618). Blackwell.

Carnie, A. (2012). Syntax: A Generative Introduction, 3rd Edition. Wiley Backwell. Link

Carnie, A. (2013). Constituent structure. Oxford Surveys in Syntax. Oxford University Press.

Chomsky, N. (2023, October 21). Aspects of the Theory of Syntax: An Online Visual Representation of Key Concepts.

Derrick, D., & Archambault, D. (2009). TreeForm: Explaining and exploring grammar through syntax trees. Literary and Linguistic Computing, 25(1), 53–66. DOI

Gazdar, G. (1985). Lexical-Functional Grammar: A Formal System for Grammatical Representation.

Jackendoff, R. (1996). Conceptual semantics and cognitive linguistics. Cognitive Linguistics, 93-129.

Juitamilay, page 6, chapter II, 2006. In ELIB UNIKOM.

Qiang Wang, Drawing Tree Diagrams: Problems and Suggestions, Journal of Language Teaching and Research, Vol. 1, No. 6, pp. 926-934, November, 2010.

Steedman, M. (2004). Tree Syntax of Natural Language. Lecture Note 1 for COM S 474. Cornell University.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.