Dekonstruksi Narasi Historis Konflik Ideologis antara Khawarij dan Murji'ah: Analisis Genealogis terhadap Sumber-sumber Sejarah Islam Klasik

Nur Rahmah Merdekawati, Indo Santalia

Abstract

This study examines the historical narrative construction of the ideological conflict between the Khawarij and Murji'ah groups in classical Islamic sources. Through a genealogical and deconstructive approach, the study unveils the biases and interests underlying the formation of these narratives. In-depth analysis of classical texts shows that the prevailing narratives tend to oversimplify the complexity of the two groups' thought and position them as the "other" that must be defined and contrasted with the emerging Sunni orthodoxy. Socio-political factors, such as the interests of power legitimation and "politics of memory," are identified as influencing the construction of these historical narratives. The deconstruction of the dominant narratives enables a more nuanced reconstruction of the theological-political thought of the Khawarij and Murji'ah, revealing the depth and complexity often obscured. The findings of this research have important implications for the methodology of Islamic historiography, emphasizing the need for a critical-deconstructive approach and considering the multiplicity of voices in understanding the dynamics of Islamic thought in the past and its relevance to contemporary discourse.

Keywords

Khawarij, Murji'ah, historical narrative, deconstruction, Islamic historiography.

Full Text:

PDF

References

Anis, A. (2016). Al-Khawarij Dan Al-Murjiah ( Sejarah Timbulnya dan Pokok-pokok Ajarannya). Jurnal Mimbar: Media Intelektual Muslim Dan Bimbingan Rohani, 2(1), 26–41. https://doi.org/10.47435/mimbar.v2i1.280

Anjar Nugroho. (2013). Wacana Islam dan Negara EraPra-Kemerdekaan: PergulatanIdeologis Kelompok Islam danNasionalis Sekuler. Afkaruna, 2, 130–147. https://doi.org/10.18196/AIIJIS.2013.

Hamdani, S. (2019). Kepimpinan Dan Sumbangan Wanita Islam Dalam Politik Semasa. Hikmah, 12(2), 170. https://doi.org/10.24952/hik.v12i2.887

Hervrizal, H. (2020). Khawarij: Sejarah Kemunculan, Ajaran-ajaran dan Sektenya. Dakwatul Islam, 5(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.46781/dakwatulislam.v5i1.203

Ilham, I. (2019). Aliran-Aliran Khawarij Dan Pemikirannya. Jurnal Mimbar: Media Intelektual Muslim Dan Bimbingan Rohani, 5(2), 117–126. https://doi.org/10.47435/mimbar.v5i2.806

Iryana, W. (2017). Keywords: Historiografi, Islam, Indonesia. Jurnal Al-Tsaqafa, 14(01), 147–164.

Islam, U., & Alauddin, N. (2021). PARADIGMA LITERALISTIK DALAM PENALARAN HUKUM ISLAM Achmad Musyahid Idrus. DIKTUM: Jurnal Syariah Dan Hukum, 18(1), 1–16.

Manshur, F. M., & Ali. (2003). Budaya Arab Pada Masa Dinasti Umayyah. Humaniora, 15(2), 172–180.

Parhan, M., Nuraini, A. S., Harianti, A., Salsabila, D., Kurniawan, I. H., & Qinthara, M. A. (2024). Sejarah Kemunculan dan Konsep Pemikiran Aliran Murjiah Serta Pengaruhnya Pada Masyarakat Islam Zaman Sekarang. IHSANIKA: Jurnal Pendidikan Agama Islam, 2(2).

Rusyd, I. (2021). Epistemologi Filsafat Islam Dan Masalah Kemunduran Peradaban Islam. Jurnal Al-Aqidah, 13(2), 117–136. https://doi.org/10.15548/ja.v13i2.3192

Sabli, M. (2015). ALIRAN-ALIRAN TEOLOGI DALAM ISLAM (Perang Shiffin dan Implikasinya Bagi Kemunculan Kelompok Khawarij dan Murjiah). Nur El-Islam, 2(1), 105–112. https://media.neliti.com/media/publications/226415-aliran-aliran-teologi-dalam-islam-perang-3369cd4a.pdf

Tahir, M. (2014). Studi Hukum Kritis dalam Kajian Hukum Islam. Istinbath: Jurnal Hukum Islam, 13(2), 202–2014.

Teng, M. B. A. (2016). Orientalis Dan Orientalisme Dalam Perspektif Sejarah. Jurnal Ilmu Budaya, 4, 48–63. https://journal.unhas.ac.id/index.php/jib/article/view/2324/1265

Uromo, A. I., & Ibrahim, R. (2023). Implikasi Dinamika Pemikiran Dan Gerakan Radikalisme Terhadap Sosio Religius Di Indonesia. ANSIRU PAI : Pengembangan Profesi Guru Pendidikan Agama Islam, 7(1), 29. https://doi.org/10.30821/ansiru.v7i1.15449

Wahyuni, Srihadi, Agil, & Yusuf. (2012). Histologi dan Histomorfometri Testis dan pada Periode Ranggah Keras. Jurnal Veteriner, 13(3), 211–219.

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.