Politik Ekonomi As dan Kondisi Perdagangan Internasional Pasca Pandemi Global

Mirahandani M, Egianinta Br Ginting, Rut Madia Harefa, Vincetia Avetriwianda Sinabutar, Widya Puspita, Hafiza Adlina

Abstract

Lacking supportive public policies in the past, many American workers and communities have borne the costs of shifting production around the world but have yet to fully reap the benefits, contributing to widening inequality. Addressing this deficiency requires policies that expand the gains from trade while leveling the international economic playing field by combating unfair trade practices and implementing a more equitable global tax system. Implementing such policy changes in a way that reduces uncertainty and engages with the United States' trading and commercial partners can ensure that American consumers, workers, businesses, and investors benefit from global trade. This paper aims to place America's economic experience during the pandemic in a global context by comparing it to our largest trading partners: the euro area, the UK, China, Canada and Mexico. The next section examines how international trade has recovered from the sharp downturn caused by the pandemic, examining the causes of the widening US trade deficit and the impact of international supply chain bottlenecks on traded inputs such as auto parts and capital goods. The final section examines how the Biden-Harris Administration reoriented US international economic policy to reduce, rather than exacerbate, economic inequality and to equalize the international economic standing.

Keywords

Internasional Trade, Politic, Pandemi

Full Text:

PDF

References

GACC (General Administration of Customs of the People’s Republic of China). 2021. Monthly Bulletin, http://english.customs.gov.cn/statics/report/monthly.html. Retrieved from Haver Analytics, “China: Merchandise Exports, FOB.â€

Giles, C. 2021. “World’s Leading Economies Agree Global Minimum Corporate Tax Rate.†Financial Times, July 1. https://www.ft.com/content/d0311794-abcf-4a2a-a8a4-bcabfc4f71fa.

Gross, A., Miller, J. and Inagaki, K. 2021. “Chip Shortage Drags on as Plant Closures Hit Carmakers.†Financial Times, September 14. https://www.ft.com/ content/86336d38-6b89-4637-a2a5-3978d14fb324.

Group of Seven. 2021. “The Joint Statement Issued by the G7 Countries at the G7 Trade Track on Forced Labour.†https://www.g7uk.org/g7-trade-ministers-statement-on-forced-labour/.

Gruber, J., A. McCallum, and R. Vigfusson. 2016. “The Dollar in the U.S. International Transactions (USIT) Model.†International Finance Discussion Paper Note. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, Washington. https://www. federalreserve.gov/econresdata/notes/ifdp-notes/2016/the-dollar-in-the-us- international-transactions-model-20160208.html.

Grubert, H., and J. Mutti. 1991. “Taxes, Tariffs and Transfer Pricing in Multinational Corporate Decision Making.†Review of Economics and Statistics 73, no. 2: 285–93.

Guvenen, F., R. Mataloni Jr., D. Rassier, and K. Ruhl. 2019. Offshore Profit Shifting and Domestic Productivity Measurement. NBER Working Paper 23324. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.

Hanson, G. 2021. “Can Trade Work for Workers?†Foreign Affairs, May–June. https:// www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/united-states/2021-04-20/can-trade-work-workers.

Hardy, B., and T. Logan. 2020. “Racial Economic Inequality Amid the COVID-19 Crisis.†Hamilton Project, Washington. https://www.brookings.edu/research/ racial-economic-inequality-amid-the-covid-19-crisis/.

Harper Petersen. 2022. “Harpex Index.†https://www.harperpetersen.com/harpex.

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.